However, the movie would probably do better to introduce the drug without having Bane enter the picture. Yes, he has a connection to the Titan conflict, as Titan is a derivative of his trademark Venom drug. The Bane in Arkham Asylum is little more than brute muscle. In the comics, he was the one who manipulated Batman to the edge of exhaustion and mental breakdown before finally crippling him. The problem with Bane is that he works best when used as a dark, shadowy mastermind figure. As for Bane, we also feel he would best be saved for a future film. Zsasz return after his cameo appearance in Batman Begins, but once again, his role may not be necessary. In turn, Killer Croc makes a good physical threat for Bats, but he may already be set in that area. Though she has some small connection to the Titan formula, it shouldn't be hard to rewrite the story to eliminate the need for Ivy. For instance, Poison Ivy isn't exactly vital to the plot, and she would better be saved for a starring role in a future film. Other villains may only be necessary to add variety to the movie or to offer Batman something to punch. Not only can they explore Bruce Wayne's continued inner turmoil, they offer the film a chance to break from the confined setting of Arkham, if only for a while. We look forward to seeing the Scarecrow-induced hallucination sequences play out on the big screen. Not only would it give Cillian Murphy the chance to reprise the role for a third time, but Scarecrow is vital to the psychological element of the film. The producers may simply want to stick to those villains that have appeared by the end of the third Nolan film. History shows us that superhero movies don't often benefit from an overabundance of villains. As for the other villains, it's probably not necessary for every single major face in the game to also appear in the movie. Their fight scenes could recall the violence and sexual tension of the Batman/Catwoman encounters in Batman Returns. Thanks to her gymnastic skills, she actually makes for a worthy opponent to Batman. Harley, on the other hand, can be much more of a showcase for the movie. Joker could very easily become a more fearsome and memorable presence this way if handled effectively. Batman will hear him in the dark and see him on TV screens, but their actual encounters can be kept as limited as necessary. Essentially, Joker can spend a good deal of the movie off camera. Harleen Quinzel, who will complete her descent to madness by setting Joker free and helping him gain control of the asylum. Rather than have Batman bring Joker back to Arkham at the opening, Joker should remain locked away in the years following his The Dark Knight capture. Who should replace Ledger in the role? Should the new Joker be modeled after the old? The film can sidestep these questions somewhat by reducing Joker's role. Sadly, the death of Heath Ledger makes using Joker in a new Batman movie a sticky proposition. One of the first and most significant changes involves Joker himself. That can form the basis of the movie's script. We're thinking " Die Hard meets The Batman." The basic premise of the game (Batman is hunting Joker through the long and winding halls of Arkham as the latter works to unleash the Titan formula) will translate just fine. However, the core of the story would work perfectly well for an intimate, brooding, and psychological thriller. Such a movie would be far too long and rambling to hold the attention of most audiences. Operating from that assumption, Arkham Asylum would form the basis for the beginning of a second trilogy. Sadly, the longer he delays the more we doubt that will actually happen, but we're going to operate under the assumption that Nolan will complete an entire Batman trilogy. The Story In an ideal world, Nolan will return for one more Batman film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |